Raja Jasti’s Blog - Renaissance Thinking

May 30, 2010

Making Youtube more like TV

Filed under: Internet, Media — Raja @ 10:35 am

Youtube has TV envy. It wants the users to watch its videos for hours in stead of minutes each day.

 

TWO weeks ago, YouTube celebrated when the number of videos viewed daily on its site reached two billion, a milestone.

But it also used the occasion to express its envy of television’s continuing hold on viewers: “Although the average user spends 15 minutes a day on YouTube, that’s tiny compared to the five hours a day people spend watching TV,” the company observed on its blog. “Clearly, we need to give you more reason to watch more videos!”

YouTube, however, faces a huge obstacle: very short videos are unlikely to hold interest when watched in long sequences. It remains to be seen whether viewers will ever be interested in watching hours and hours of typically two-and-a-half-minute videos, even if produced professionally and well matched to individual tastes and moods.

The end of a program — whether it has lasted two minutes or two hours — invites consideration of doing something else. In YouTube’s case, of course, the end comes often. Jamie Davidson, a YouTube product manager, says that the 15 minutes of daily viewing by a user typically involves six videos, with the conclusion of each presenting “a decision point, and every decision point is an opportunity to leave.”

“We’re looking at how to push users into passive-consumption mode, a lean-back experience,” Mr. Davidson says.

Margaret Stewart, chief of YouTube’s user experience team, says the site is not only striving to “sequence short-form content seamlessly,” but is also building up “long-form content,” television shows, professionally produced Webisodes and movies, as well as live sporting and music events. She says YouTube has 7,000 hours of movies and shows to offer.

But an embarrassingly visible portion seems to be of a type that fails to be even entertainingly bad. In January, the critic Joe Queenan inventoried in The Guardian the contents he found: “Tons of schlock, cult films, trash, direct-to-video overstock and tongue-in-cheek vanity projects.”

“The Torture Chamber of Dr. Sadism” and “Cheerleader Ninjas” were among the YouTube titles of which Mr. Queenan said: “All sound great. But they are not great. Not, not, not.”

This fall, YouTube says it will introduce a radically different, uncluttered look, with YouTube Leanback. It will have a separate Web address and will start playing a video the moment a user clicks on the site. When one video ends, another will start automatically, eliminating those dreaded “decision points” that invite abandonment. Viewers will be able to select channels, but the flow of programs, whether short or long, will be continuous.

“There’s no browsing, no searching, no clicking. It behaves like you would expect television to,” said Hunter Walk, a YouTube program manager who provided a brief peek this month at Google’s developer conference.

Telemedicine using 2-way video

Filed under: Internet, Mobile, Technology — Raja @ 10:26 am

NYT has a nice feature on the growing use of 2-way video for telemedicine.

 

Dr. Jerry Jones uses two-way video at his home in Houston to consult with a patient across town. Dr. Jones is under contract to NuPhysicia, one of the new telemedicine companies.

ONE day last summer, Charlie Martin felt a sharp pain in his lower back. But he couldn’t jump into his car and rush to the doctor’s office or the emergency room: Mr. Martin, a crane operator, was working on an oil rig in the South China Sea off Malaysia.

He could, though, get in touch with a doctor thousands of miles away, via two-way video. Using an electronic stethoscope that a paramedic on the rig held in place, Dr. Oscar W. Boultinghouse, an emergency medicine physician in Houston, listened to Mr. Martin’s heart.

“The extreme pain strongly suggested a kidney stone,” Dr. Boultinghouse said later. A urinalysis on the rig confirmed the diagnosis, and Mr. Martin flew to his home in Mississippi for treatment.

Mr. Martin, 32, is now back at work on the same rig, the Courageous, leased by Shell Oil. He says he is grateful he could discuss his pain by video with the doctor. “It’s a lot better than trying to describe it on a phone,” Mr. Martin says.

Dr. Boultinghouse and two colleagues — Michael J. Davis and Glenn G. Hammack— run NuPhysicia, a start-up company they spun out from the University of Texas in 2007 that specializes in face-to-face telemedicine, connecting doctors and patients by two-way video.

Spurred by health care trends and technological advances, telemedicine is growing into a mainstream industry. A fifth of Americans live in places where primary care physicians are scarce, according to government statistics. That need is converging with advances that include lower costs for video-conferencing equipment, more high-speed communications links by satellite, and greater ability to work securely and dependably over the Internet.

“The technology has improved to the point where the experience of both the doctor and patient are close to the same as in-person visits, and in some cases better,” says Dr. Kaveh Safavi, head of global health care for Cisco Systems, which is supporting trials of its own high-definition video version of telemedicine in California, Colorado and New Mexico.

The interactive telemedicine business has been growing by almost 10 percent annually, to more than $500 million in revenue in North America this year, according to Datamonitor, the market research firm. It is part of the $3.9 billion telemedicine category that includes monitoring devices in homes and hundreds of health care applications for smartphones.

Christine Chang, a health care technology analyst at Datamonitor’s Ovum unit, says telemedicine will allow doctors to take better care of larger numbers of patients. “Some patients will be seen by teleconferencing, some will send questions by e-mail, others will be monitored” using digitized data on symptoms or indicators like glucose levels, she says.

Eventually, she predicts, “one patient a day might come into a doctor’s office, in person.”

May 29, 2010

Startup Lessons: How to make Freemium work

Filed under: Entrepreneurship — Raja @ 11:19 am

From Evernote CEO Philbin (via Techcrunch):

Founder Showcase - Phil Libin Keynote from Adeo Ressi on Vimeo.

Here are some of the main points Libin covered during his talk:

  • Sometimes people say “The best product doesn’t always win”, and are implying that you should focus on other areas, like marketing. In the Internet age, a good product can get the rest of that stuff (marketing, etc.) for free. So focus on that. And then charge for it.
  • A year ago Evernote was making most of its money from licensing its technology, but it focused on its premium plans ($5/month or $45/year) because that was more scalable. Now, premium subscriptions bring in around $300-400k a month, and licensing represents around $45k.
  • Evernote has 3.1 million cumulative users, and adds around 10k a day. Around 68k paying customers.
  • Users have grown more valuable over time. New users convert to premium at a rate of .5%.  But of the users that signed up two years ago and are still active, 20% have become paid customers.
  • This trend is important — most users quit quickly. But the ones that stay become much more likely to pay over time.
  • Evernote’s cost per user is around 9 cents per active user per month. It makes around 25 cents per user per month. The site reached break even a year and a half ago.
  • Entrepreneurs should aim to be making money on each new active user as soon as possible. Otherwise scaling just means you’re losing money faster, rather than earning it

May 24, 2010

Requirements for SaaS companies

Filed under: Internet, Technology — Raja @ 11:20 am

SaaS (Software as a Service) is all the rage these days. But what does is take to be a SaaS provider? GigaOm takes a good post on this topic.

In order to become a sustained market leader in SaaS, software companies need to focus on building and delivering a highly efficient service to their customers without spending significant money on the underlying infrastructure (cloud or otherwise). A poor architecture will underutilize server resources, making software costly to deliver.

Feature-wise, most SaaS applications have the ability to quickly provision new customers to the system as well as to manage subscriptions in order to identify the types of application functionality they’ve purchased access to, metering systems to track what was used so they can be billed appropriately, and the ability to roll out upgrades to a live environment. The addition of such features could take anywhere from six months if the goal is to “just to get by” to well over a year if it’s to reach full SaaS stack maturity.

To be a market leader, however, companies must be willing to go the distance and attempt to reach full maturity as quickly as possible. Architecturally, this means: 

Handling multitenancy: The days of managing and executing data for a single customer at a time are over. To succeed in the cloud, software companies must be able to simultaneously recognize and handle requests from many customers (and their associated end users) at once. From a delivery standpoint this means one instance of your SaaS offering must segregate customers efficiently and offer them their own unique experience, despite sharing an instance of the software and the underlying resources. From a technical standpoint, this massive efficiency of scale adds significant complexity, and, as with most fields, complexity is money. 

Scale-out: In order be able to meet the aggregate demand of all customers, not just the largest, the software has to be able to utilize the elastic capacity offered by cloud infrastructure such as EC2, to give them the ability to scale-out each of their components independently. Simply running on EC2 doesn’t mean your application can scale infinitely, but that your application has infinite resources at its disposal if it knew what to do with them and how to manage them. And knowing what to do with an infinite number of resources requires highly complex software architectures that most applications simply don’t have. Maintaining a level of abstraction from the underlying hardware, and being able to dispatch requests from any user to any part of the network provides the foundation for such scale-out. 

Customer management: Of all of the cloud’s distinct advantages, among the most prominent are its superior operations and customer management tools such as customer provisioning, upgrade engines and monitoring. Granted, such tools have to be built into the core architecture, but by allowing customers to track their end users’ activities, they provide a path to stable and recurring revenue streams. Customer provisioning systems even allow a software vendor to seamlessly “turn on” a new customer without impacting existing ones.

It takes more than just building web based version of desktop software to be a good SaaS player. The SaaS customer value proposition is about reducing the friction of  buying, using and managing applications and solutions.

May 21, 2010

Short Film - Validation

Filed under: Entrepreneurship, Personal — Raja @ 5:44 pm

Validation from Robert Rowe on Vimeo.

Short Film - A thousand words

Filed under: Entertainment, Personal — Raja @ 5:43 pm

A Thousand Words from Ted Chung on Vimeo.

May 20, 2010

Rakuten buys Buy.com

Filed under: Business, Internet — Raja @ 10:22 am

The E-commerce industry has been seeing a lot of innovation and activity lately. Japanese E-commerce giant Rakuten is acquiring US based shopping site Buy.com for $250M.

Rakuten (which, in its home market, is much bigger than Amazon Japan) today announced [PDF] it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire California-based shopping portal Buy.com for $250 million next month. The all-cash deal will be handled by Rakuten USA (headquartered in Boston), which is expected to merge with Buy.com in the process.

Rakuten in Japan counts 64 million members, while Buy.com claims 14 million customers who are mainly located in the US and Europe. Last fiscal year, the Japanese company reached $3.2 billion in sales, and currently boasts a market cap of $9.4 billion at the Tokyo Stock Exchange

Rakuten already expanded into selected markets in Asia (subdisiary Rakuten Travel, for example, is active in Korea, Thailand, China and elsewhere), after acquiring New York-based advertising network LinkShare for $425 million five years ago. But the Buy.com deal marks the first try for the Japanese to seriously enter the American e-retail market, with Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani saying he sees the acquisition as a chance to set up a truly global marketplace that can eventually be used by sellers and buyers regardless of their location.

There seems to be a lot going on in Asia’s e-commerce sector lately. The Rakuten-Buy.com deal follows the spectacular cross-border partnership forged by China’s e-commerce behemoth Taobao and Yahoo Japan just ten days ago. Rakuten itself and China’s leading search engine company Baidu announced plans to invest $50 million in a virtual shopping mall that is scheduled to go live later this year back in January.

Native apps or Web apps

Filed under: Internet, Mobile, Technology, Trends — Raja @ 9:54 am

Sergey Brin sees them converging in the not too distant future.

Google co-founder Sergey Brin went further. “These models are likely to converge in the future. And not the too distant future,” Brin says.

He notes that during the keynote today, we got a glimpse at how the HTML model is coming along. Web apps are now able to go offline, and they can have richer graphics thanks to HTML5. “It’s getting similar to app frameworks,” he says. He also notes that there are benefits to using web apps versus native apps, such as the lack of installation, and certain aspects of security. ”It’s headed in a positive direction, but these are fairly recent developments,” Brin says.

Brin acknowledges that for now, the market is proving the need for native apps. The current generation of cellphones aren’t quite powerful enough, and HTML5 isn’t quite developed enough, he notes. Pichai also notes that screen sizes on mobile devices makes native apps more enticing as well.

As I keep saying mobile web will just be web in a few years. The mobile ecosystem today is similar to the PC ecoystem in the early 80s. There will always be some native apps just as there are desktop apps now, but future web apps will run on many devices such as computers, mobile phones, tablet devices, TVs etc.

May 19, 2010

Turning Dreams to Reality is Hard Work

Filed under: Entrepreneurship — Raja @ 10:49 am

Fred Wilson wrote a very nice blog post on the hard work that takes to turn dreams and hopes of a startup to a real business. Truth.

Companies start out as hopes and dreams and stay there for at least a little while. Even after the product has been launched and users are jumping aboard, the company is still in hopes and dreams mode.

But eventually one of three things happens to a company; it goes out of business, it gets sold, or it becomes a real business.

And one of the most interesting things to watch and learn from, as an entrepreneur or investor in entrepreneurs, is what happens when you go from hopes and dreams to the real thing.

There is a big chasm between hopes and dreams and the real thing. Companies need to grow up and go through the ugly adolescent phase. They start to doubt themselves, they start to churn employees, they may even go through a management change or two. Getting across this chasm is hard, it takes tenacity, both from the entrepreneur and team and from the investors. Everyone has to stay the course, buy into the plan, and execute it.

Crossing the chasm to the real thing is not nearly as fun as the hopes and dreams phase. It is hard work and it happens after the gushing media has left your company for the shiny new thing. Your company will take a morale hit and you will have to lead it through this phase.

But getting to the other side is worth all of it. There is nothing as satisfying in entrepreneur land than having a profitable growing sustainable business that doesn’t need another dime of anyone else’s capital. I have watched entrepreneurs stand up in front of their teams and tell them that they’ve reached that point. I get chills every time I see it.

I can really indetify with this as we are putting in this hardwork right now to turn our dreams into reality.

Graphic: Every Country is Best at Something

Filed under: general — Raja @ 10:25 am

Here is a cool graphic from ‘information is beautiful’ site.

Example Company
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress